sharetrader
Results 1 to 10 of 2406

Threaded View

  1. #11
    On the doghouse
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    , , New Zealand.
    Posts
    9,422

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Snoopy View Post
    Te Mihi has a design output of 166MW. FY2014 is six years ago. So I am going to allow for build inflation of 4% per year, about twice the inflation target, since that date to get FY2020 construction costs.

    $623m x (1.04)^6 = $788m

    The amount of construction capital available would suggest Contact can build its next geothermal station larger than Te Mihi.

    166MW x($1,074m / $788m) = 226MW

    If Contact constructed such a station today, how would that affect the size of their generation portfolio?
    Contact Energy Hydro Station Generation Capacity Notes Contact Energy Geothermal Station Generation Capacity Notes
    Clyde 464MW Commissioned FY1992 Ohaaki 48MW Commissioned FY1989
    Roxburgh 320MW Commissioned 1956 Te Huaka 28MW Commissioned FY2010
    Wairakei 145MW Commissioned 1958, Modified FY2005
    Poihipi 65MW Commissioned FY1997
    Te Mihi 166MW Commissioned FY2014
    Total 784MW Total 452MW
    Effective Capacity Factor 0.514 Effective Capacity Factor 0.940
    Total Operationally Adjusted 403MW Total Operationally Adjusted 425MW

    Adding a new geothermal station of 226MW that would operate at 94% availability would lift Contacts expected operating generating capacity by:

    (226MW x 0.94) / (403MW + 425MW) = +25.7%

    SNOOPY
    Last edited by Snoopy; 20-12-2020 at 09:06 AM.
    Watch out for the most persistent and dangerous version of Covid-19: B.S.24/7

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •