-
26-04-2021, 12:49 PM
#21221
Originally Posted by winner69
Down another 1% plus on ASX today
Make that 2% down..
-
26-04-2021, 12:53 PM
#21222
Member
Originally Posted by Balance
Does not mean that its premium positioning is not taking a beating - ultimate proof will be sales numbers.
When China consumers can get the genuine NZ product, shipped all the way from NZ to their door, at over 40% discount - what does that say about the advertised China label price?
At JD.com, search by "sales volume", A2 Chinese label stage 3 IF rank at No. 6. Same products: Bellamy at No. 28, Aptamil at No. 31, Nestle at No. 69.
You yourself can check my above-mentioned.
Last edited by Lease; 26-04-2021 at 12:54 PM.
-
26-04-2021, 02:07 PM
#21223
Originally Posted by Lease
At JD.com, search by "sales volume", A2 Chinese label stage 3 IF rank at No. 6. Same products: Bellamy at No. 28, Aptamil at No. 31, Nestle at No. 69.
You yourself can check my above-mentioned.
I am sure you are right, Lease - no need for me to check.
Issue is how much of ATM sales volume actually go through JD.com of the company’s total sales.
Anyone know?
-
26-04-2021, 02:29 PM
#21224
Peter Nathan’s 800,000 options expire 12th May,2021. Instos keeping this price depressed so he gets punished for his poor performance and complacency the last 9 months.
-
26-04-2021, 02:43 PM
#21225
Deleted...somebody answered
Last edited by winner69; 26-04-2021 at 03:45 PM.
-
26-04-2021, 03:17 PM
#21226
Originally Posted by aperitif
Peter Nathan’s 800,000 options expire 12th May,2021. Instos keeping this price depressed so he gets punished for his poor performance and complacency the last 9 months.
Sounds like one of these crazy conspiracy theories. Frankly, I think you overestimate the sense of fairness and the resolve of "the institutions", whoever this might be.
Worse - you clearly misjudge what might drive a bunch of greedy competing institutions - there are only two things diving them: !) For the respective fund manger to earn a big bonus and 2) for the respective institution to make money. If 1 and 2 are conflicting, than 1) prevails.
Punishing poor performing board managers by artificially keeping the share price low is clearly nothing which would drive them ... unless it would be related to the bonus payment of the fund manager ;
----
"Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future" (Niels Bohr)
-
26-04-2021, 03:19 PM
#21227
Originally Posted by aperitif
Peter Nathan’s 800,000 options expire 12th May,2021. Instos keeping this price depressed so he gets punished for his poor performance and complacency the last 9 months.
Peter Nathan executed those options on 2nd of March. http://nzx-prod-s7fsd7f98s.s3-websit...484/341612.pdf
-
26-04-2021, 03:28 PM
#21228
Originally Posted by xp04
He got them for 60c - so still plenty of gains to be made - but obviously not as much as when he exercised them.
-
26-04-2021, 03:33 PM
#21229
Originally Posted by Balance
He got them for 60c - so still plenty of gains to be made - but obviously not as much as when he exercised them.
Gains or no gains or how much will be known when he sells them. Could be tomorrow, could be in two years time, no point to play guess game
-
26-04-2021, 05:13 PM
#21230
Originally Posted by sb9
Make that 2% down..
And now 3%
“ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks