Labour govt 2020-23

[Baa_Baa]

Well that’s a lot of big words at this time of day. You should google the meaning of shill - you may be one but count me out

Why google 'Shill' which just trawls millions of websites and turns up all sorts of weird definitions, when you can use a dictionary, how about Merriam Webster "to act as a spokesperson or promoter", or Collins "a person who publicizes or praises something or someone for reasons of self-interest, personal profit, or friendship or loyalty" (like a voter).

Sorry about the big words, didn't mean to talk over your your intellect or comprehension, maybe google them?

Come up with something that is objective about the Dr, something that acknowledges he may actually have a point despite the shallow responses from his bosses. At least be open minded, give him the benefit of the doubt until both he or the Labour bosses prove otherwise.

Just defending Labour and debasing the Dr at this stage is, shilling the argument in favour of Labour.

[Panda-NZ-]

The media it seems has turned into the woman's weekly recently.

[Balance]

Investigation required into how the ‘most transparent’ government coaches its MPs to circumvent the OIA requirement :

https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/polit...ve-claims.html

An investigation into her ‘kindness’ mantra should be investigated - what kind of scumbag have we got fur a PM who attempts to gaslight another person as mentally unsound - because she cannot handle the truth getting out?

Disgusting woman.

‘Sharma says he was warned that the machinations of the Labour Party would either discredit his claims or blame mental health. And the warning was sound. The Prime Minister's Office has moved to discredit him saying he is misrepresenting conversations, his wellbeing called into question.’

[Panda-NZ-]

Investigation required into how the ‘most transparent’ government coaches its MPs to circumvent the OIA requirement :

Which is still legal.

While having secret recordings is probably not.

[Bjauck]

Investigation required into how the ‘most transparent’ government coaches its MPs to circumvent the OIA requirement :

https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/polit...ve-claims.html

An investigation into her ‘kindness’ mantra should be investigated - what kind of scumbag have we got fur a PM who attempts to gaslight another person as mentally unsound - because she cannot handle the truth getting out?

Disgusting woman.

‘Sharma says he was warned that the machinations of the Labour Party would either discredit his claims or blame mental health. And the warning was sound. The Prime Minister's Office has moved to discredit him saying he is misrepresenting conversations, his wellbeing called into question.’

An interesting opinion piece. It sounds ike this government was just acting as previous governments have done. Of course if Labour fails to deliver on a campaign promise for increased transparency, and not more of the same old ways, then that is up to the voters to judge them at the polls, and to decide which other Party would deliver a more transparent government.

[Panda-NZ-]

An interesting opinion piece. It sounds ike this government was just acting as previous governments have done. Of course if Labour fails to deliver on a campaign promise for increased transparency, and not more of the same old ways, then that is up to the voters to judge them at the polls, and to decide which other Party would deliver a more transparent government.

Provided that National will not release their "independent" report into sam's potentially criminal conduct then we can rule them out.

[Balance]

Leading news article in Australia :

‘What is she hiding? Scandal rocks Ardern.’

https://www.news.com.au/world/pacifi...ff440e97a78ef9

[Panda-NZ-]

Leading = buried half way down the page.

[Balance]

And yet more revelations this morning.

On Newshub Nation now.

Dr Sharma being interviewed and he has released the letter he sent to Ardern’s office.

It is all written down and should be more revelations to come out before the Tuesday caucus meeting.

[Getty]

In this mornings Newshub interview, Dr Sharma presented as credible, coherent, lucid, sharp, rational, relaxed & attentive, as he did in an earlier interview I commented on.

Not symptoms of bipolar disorder, or on medication for it, as inferred by one or two.

The 'transparent trio' of Ardern, McAnulty & Szabo declined their invitations to appear.

Do they have something to hide?

Conversely, Matt McCarten made a strong visual statement, evidencing homelessness under Labour, by appearing as if he had been sleeping rough under a hedge, despite the efforts of the make up crew.