Quote Originally Posted by DarkHorse View Post
I'm waiting for proof of scalability - can they get compound revenue growth and do it without a commensurate rise in expenses?
And that is the $64m question. Collecting, collating, storing data is expensive, maintaining monitoring stations in the field, given the distances between them, is not cheap. Also, there's recalibration of field stations to take into account changing environmentals conditions. It'll mostly be of benefit to farmers IMO, but may be adopted for risk management by others.

I've been invested for a few years, lack of liquidity was a concern, realised it was very hard to get my money out, but really interested in what the company is doing, so letting it ride for now. Not sure it'll make any serious money until proof of scalability vs opex is confirmed.