sharetrader
Page 688 of 697 FirstFirst ... 188588638678684685686687688689690691692 ... LastLast
Results 6,871 to 6,880 of 6963
  1. #6871
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    1,176

    Default

    The growers said picking was often hard physical work and was unsuitable for many of the people the Labour Party was trying to steer in its direction.
    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/country/428232/growers-warn-time-is-slipping-by-for-harvest-amid-dire-need-for-pickers

    With pruning kiwifruit there is a high risk of RSI/OOS so it is not suitable for everyone.

  2. #6872
    Legend
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Sth Island. New Zealand.
    Posts
    6,436

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by moka View Post
    If the family home was taxed under capital gains it would deter people from moving to another job in another city because they would not be able to purchase an equivalent home, which would not be good for the employee, the business, the economy and NZ as a whole.
    Precisely why some cgt systems have a repatriation clause allowing an assett to be sold cgt free provided the assett is replaced within a certain time frame

  3. #6873
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    1,176

    Default

    Getting workers to pick fruit is a long-standing problem as this press release on 20 January 2004 by the National party shows.

    National says get foreign fruit pickers picking
    The Minister of Immigration (Lianne Dalziel) has the power to grant exceptions to policy to allow visiting backpackers to pick fruit, and she should do so, says National MP Murray McCully.
    https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA0401/S00124.htm

  4. #6874
    Guru
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    3,323

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by justakiwi View Post
    Depending on how long the temp work was for, their benefit would be suspended every week they earned more than their usual benefit payment. Problem with that is, you declare your earnings in the week you earn it not the week you get paid for it, so someone could potentially find the self/their family, with no income at all for two weeks (or more depending on timing and pay schedule of orchard etc).
    You can't go on and off work - there are stand downs.

  5. #6875
    Guru justakiwi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Canterbury
    Posts
    2,569

    Default

    I worked part time while on the benefit - variable hours, some weeks no work. I declared my income every Friday and my benefit was adjusted accordingly for the following week. If I had earned more than my benefit amount that week, I got no benefit the following week. If I earned more than $80 gross a week my benefit was reduced the next week. If I earned less $80 gross or less, my benefit wasn’t affected. If you obtain casual, short term work, the system will work the same. It would also probably depend on how much you earned over the temp period, and there may be a limit to the number of weeks you can work like this. You would have to check with WINZ for that information.

    Quote Originally Posted by dobby41 View Post
    You can't go on and off work - there are stand downs.

  6. #6876
    Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    4,764

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by moka View Post
    If the family home was taxed under capital gains it would deter people from moving to another job in another city because they would not be able to purchase an equivalent home, which would not be good for the employee, the business, the economy and NZ as a whole.
    That is probably the exisiting case anyway for those moving from a cheaper area to Auckland for example. There would be an argument for allowing Cgt to be property inflation adjusted. It would mean equity in home that had been leveraged would have the cgt levied in a rising market.

  7. #6877
    Guru
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    3,323

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by justakiwi View Post
    I worked part time while on the benefit - variable hours, some weeks no work. I declared my income every Friday and my benefit was adjusted accordingly for the following week. If I had earned more than my benefit amount that week, I got no benefit the following week. If I earned more than $80 gross a week my benefit was reduced the next week. If I earned less $80 gross or less, my benefit wasn’t affected. If you obtain casual, short term work, the system will work the same. It would also probably depend on how much you earned over the temp period, and there may be a limit to the number of weeks you can work like this. You would have to check with WINZ for that information.
    Thanks for the info on how it really works.

  8. #6878
    Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    4,764

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by justakiwi View Post
    I worked part time while on the benefit - variable hours, some weeks no work. I declared my income every Friday and my benefit was adjusted accordingly for the following week. If I had earned more than my benefit amount that week, I got no benefit the following week. If I earned more than $80 gross a week my benefit was reduced the next week. If I earned less $80 gross or less, my benefit wasn’t affected. If you obtain casual, short term work, the system will work the same. It would also probably depend on how much you earned over the temp period, and there may be a limit to the number of weeks you can work like this. You would have to check with WINZ for that information.
    I think today support cut-out points are somewhat higher than the benefit payable - if I understand the WINZ tables correctly. They should be of course as there are costs involved in getting to and having a job.
    https://www.workandincome.govt.nz/ma...s-current.html
    Last edited by Bjauck; 29-10-2020 at 03:53 PM.

  9. #6879
    Guru justakiwi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Canterbury
    Posts
    2,569

    Default

    Things have improved according to that information, which is a good thing. I wonder if the $80 gross income point has changed too? It was $80 back in 2002 and was still $80 three years ago. Nowhere near enough to help people get back into work and off the benefit.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bjauck View Post
    I think today support cut-out points are somewhat higher than the benefit payable - if I understand the WINZ tables correctly. They should be of course as there are costs involved in getting to and having a job.
    https://www.workandincome.govt.nz/ma...s-current.html

  10. #6880
    Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    4,764

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by justakiwi View Post
    Things have improved according to that information, which is a good thing. I wonder if the $80 gross income point has changed too? It was $80 back in 2002 and was still $80 three years ago. Nowhere near enough to help people get back into work and off the benefit.
    It depends on the benefit: e.g Jobseeker single $90; Solo parent $115.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •