sharetrader
Page 46 of 127 FirstFirst ... 364243444546474849505696 ... LastLast
Results 451 to 460 of 1268
  1. #451
    Missed by that much
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    898

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grimy View Post
    I only need it to get to 24 cents to break even...........
    I'm thinking of selling half my holding. Then the other half will have cost me $0.00

  2. #452
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Ak
    Posts
    413

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grimy View Post
    I only need it to get to 24 cents to break even...........
    Agm next week Grimy - make your vote count and who knows

  3. #453
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Auckland, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    808

    Default

    Voted online earlier in the week.

  4. #454
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Ak
    Posts
    413

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grimy View Post
    Voted online earlier in the week.
    Nice work Grimy

    I note the share price is up to 11.5 cents on reasonable volume.

    Hmmm, interesting

  5. #455
    Missed by that much
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    898

    Default

    https://www.nzx.com/companies/NWF/announcements/273932
    I hope that means two new directors are in. The writing on the wall was too great for the two retiring directors and it appears they didn't want to wait for the vote.

    Hoping this is congratulations to the two new directors.
    Last edited by Jantar; 23-11-2015 at 05:47 PM.

  6. #456
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Ak
    Posts
    413

    Default

    Results of AGM voting -

    No Directors were re-elected or elected so the Board is now 3 members.


    NZ Windfarms Limited (“NWF”) advises the results of resolutions from the Shareholders AnnualMeeting held in Auckland on Tuesday 24 November 2015.
    As previously advised, Vicki Buck and Michael Stiassny advised that they would retire as directors ofthe Company at the conclusion of the Annual Meeting and not seek re-election. ConsequentlyResolutions 2 and 3 in the Notice of Meeting were not put to the meeting.
    The results of the polls held on the remaining resolutions were:


    Resolution
    For


    [IMG]file:///page1image9064[/IMG]
    [IMG]file:///page1image9520[/IMG] Against
    [IMG]file:///page1image11136[/IMG] [IMG]file:///page1image11560[/IMG] % For
    Result
    1
    Remuneration of Auditor
    That the Board be authorised to fix theauditor's fees and expenses for thefinancial year ending 30 June 2016.
    199,580,669
    97,900
    99.95
    Carried
    4
    Election of Director
    That Heiko Mueller-Cajar be elected as aDirector.
    [IMG]file:///page1image24200[/IMG] 17,178,835
    144,665,274
    10.61
    NotCarried
    5
    Election of Director
    That Samuel Viskovic be elected as aDirector.
    47,242,905


    [IMG]file:///page1image33688[/IMG]
    152,719,069
    23.63
    NotCarried
    6
    Shareholder Resolution
    That the Board prioritise theidentification of ongoing cost savings toenable the payment of a maiden dividendin 2016.
    125,698,304
    71,055,738
    63.89
    Carried




    Will be interesting to see what happens next
    Last edited by Crackity; 25-11-2015 at 10:09 AM. Reason: sp

  7. #457
    Guru
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    3,025

    Default

    Given the low vote for the new directors, it would have been interesting to see if Stiassney and Buck would have got through. Only 3 will be good to cut costs but assume they will now look for someone new to fill the void.

  8. #458
    Missed by that much
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    898

    Default

    Resolution 6 being carried is effectively a vote of no confidence in the entire current board. It is merely stating what should be any board's duty of care, yet the current board recommended that it not be carried.

  9. #459
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Ak
    Posts
    413

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jantar View Post
    Resolution 6 being carried is effectively a vote of no confidence in the entire current board. It is merely stating what should be any board's duty of care, yet the current board recommended that it not be carried.
    I think you are correct Jantar.

    This play is only up to the end of Act 2 - Act 3 still to come....

  10. #460
    IMO
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Floating Anchor Shoals
    Posts
    9,743

    Default

    So how will this next act play out in what time frame and who can activate it, major shareholders?Thanks.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •