sharetrader
Page 317 of 465 FirstFirst ... 217267307313314315316317318319320321327367417 ... LastLast
Results 3,161 to 3,170 of 4648
  1. #3161
    percy
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    christchurch
    Posts
    17,247

    Default

    Anyone wanting to learn "the truth" about the retirement village sector, would be well advised to read this week's "Taking Stock" at www.chrislee.co.nz.

  2. #3162
    Guru
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Auckland, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    3,246

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by percy View Post
    Anyone wanting to learn "the truth" about the retirement village sector, would be well advised to read this week's "Taking Stock" at www.chrislee.co.nz.
    https://www.chrislee.co.nz/taking-stock

  3. #3163
    percy
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    christchurch
    Posts
    17,247

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 777 View Post
    Thank you for posting the link.

  4. #3164
    Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    4,776

    Default

    Good explanation as to why villages remain popular with incoming residents. He praises the changes in MET, which is good to hear (Disc: I own MET shares!)I liked his mentioning the sustainability of the business model of the listed operators.

    However, he did not seem to know why a young reporter would regard someone owning a mortgage free house of $500,000 as rich. Even raising a deposit to buy is difficult for young buyers today. House prices have increased by more thanthe increase in incomes. So to a young reporter owning a house seems out of reach. To a young reporter $500,000 could well represent much more than they would be able to save in a lifetime on their current after tax salary and and after rent and other expenses. That would be why they think someone with $500,000 is rich. One must wonder - will the extra-inflationary increase in land values owing to the drop in interest rates continue or will the next change be a deflationary one, due to an increase in interest rates?

  5. #3165
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    512

    Default

    depending on how you define rich tho.. if you use income as a measure (usually newspaper uses this as a measure), retired people are not.. but if you use net asset, maybe they are..

  6. #3166
    Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    4,776

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by babymonster View Post
    depending on how you define rich tho.. if you use income as a measure (usually newspaper uses this as a measure), retired people are not.. but if you use net asset, maybe they are..
    To most (young and not so young) people having a mortgage free $500,000 house is rich. Although in Auckland you would be lucky to find many properties at that price, which shows how ridiculous prices are in Auckland.

    Often the retired may be asset rich but cash poor. You can also be rich in knowledge but poor in financial assets! Generally a rich person is one who has unencumbered assets. If you have a high income but it all goes on expenses without any ability to save or amass investments, you may be a high earner but you are not rich. You can have a high income in Auckland but with most of your after tax income being eaten up by the high rent and transport costs....so it is the number of valuable assets that you can accumulate that makes you rich or not.

  7. #3167
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    284

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 777 View Post
    Good read, although there's an element of "fake news" in it. Lee says Rymans require incomers to be 75, whereas the truth is they need to be 70.

    By the by, the outfit Lee chairs, the Parkland Retirement Village Waikanae, is big scale. 25 hectares, 209 villas, 54 rest home apartments, hospital care, ..

  8. #3168
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    540

    Default

    Are we going to breakout this time?
    it seems to be taking off a bit lately and reaching its previous highs. A reasonable profit should see it at $11 or 12 next year ?

  9. #3169
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    1,868

    Default

    Similar trend across the industry. Despite all the short term discussions in the aged care sector about failing house prices, leaky buildings, increased staff costs etc its a stock that I'm happy to hold for the next 10-20 years.

  10. #3170
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    443

    Default

    I'd like to see it go thru $10 and hold over for a bit. Aussie is a big point of differentiation to the other sector players - happy to hold this long term too. I'd love a share split but at what price point would they look at that?

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •