sharetrader
Page 326 of 568 FirstFirst ... 226276316322323324325326327328329330336376426 ... LastLast
Results 3,251 to 3,260 of 5678
  1. #3251
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    1,347

    Default it's complicated

    Quote Originally Posted by bunter View Post
    Spec div - see above.

    Operating EBITDA - that is the approach I tried to use.

    Took the company's figure for operating EBITDA, which excludes excluding associates' earnings, non-operating items and fair value adjustments.

    Then took off interest and tax.

    As it happens - it give a figure ('EBDA-ASS' above) which coincidentally is the same as the reported NPAT.

    Does that method look right to you - any income in there that shouldn't be?
    You have picked one of the more complex annual reports to decipher. This is my calc for underlying earnings
    Operating EBITDA 58747
    Equity accounted earnings of associates 2521
    DA -11242
    Abnornal depreciation of IT system 3500
    EBIT 53526
    Interest -7926
    NPBT 45600
    TAX @28% 12768
    NPAT 32832
    eps 0.043

    Further, I expect PGW is provide dividends that are approx 100% of earnings.

    Remember earnings do not equal cashflow. Operating Cashflow - capex allows the payment of dividends. Sometime increasing debt can be used as well.
    No advice here. Just banter. DYOR

  2. #3252
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    274

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by noodles View Post
    You have picked one of the more complex annual reports to decipher.
    It does look complicated. Maybe your figures are a 'normalised NPAT'.

    Remember earnings do not equal cashflow. Operating Cashflow - capex allows the payment of dividends. Sometime increasing debt can be used as well.
    Hadn't forgotten. Operating cashflow was what I tried to work out - being operating ebitda less interest and tax. Just wanted to be sure this figure was not less than the reported NPAT. Didn't look at CAPEX.

    In fact it is almost the same - $42.3m.

    If 2015 is 10% better than 2014, PGW will have about 46.5m available for divs.

  3. #3253
    On the doghouse
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    , , New Zealand.
    Posts
    9,318

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bunter View Post
    I excluded the 1c special dividend from the 2014 dividend figures.
    From NZX...

    22/08/2014 Final 3.500c 0.618c 1.361c 03/10/2014 NZD
    10/03/2014 Interim 2.000c 0.353c 0.778c 02/04/2014 NZD

    I used 2.5c + IC for the final div.

    Excluding the special div it paid 80% of NPAT out (don't know about 'normalised').
    I think it is reasonable to use 80% payout for 2015.

    BTW by my calcs, including the special dividend, PGW didn't pay more than it earned in 2014 - it paid 98% of total earnings.
    Fair enough Bunter. Like noodles, I am a shareholder, so I will be much better off if your calculations and estimates are correct.

    Unlike noodles I would also take off $1.388m in revenue from 'changes in fair value', mainly livestock valuations of animals in stock. That should reduce 'normalised NPAT' further by:

    (1-0.28) x -$1.388m = -$1.000m

    Not sure what noodles means when he adds back $3.5m for 'abnormal depreciation of an IT system'. I thought that software was amortised as an intangible under goodwill, not depreciated. Hopefully noodles will explain where that $3.5m he added back comes from because I can't find it in either note 25 or 26.

    I think I would also add back the foreign exchange loss of $1,664m (not subject to income tax?) declared in note 12

    SNOOPY
    Last edited by Snoopy; 04-02-2015 at 10:52 PM.
    Watch out for the most persistent and dangerous version of Covid-19: B.S.24/7

  4. #3254
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    1,347

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Snoopy View Post
    Fair enough Bunter. Like noodles, I am a shareholder, so I will be much better off if your calculations and estimates are correct. Unlike noodles I would also take off $1.388m in revenue from 'changes in fair value', mainly livestock valuations of animals in stock. That should reduce 'normalised profit' further by:

    (1-0.28) x $1.388m = $1.000m
    My normalised profit does not include:
    -Fair value adjustments
    -Non operating items
    No advice here. Just banter. DYOR

  5. #3255
    On the doghouse
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    , , New Zealand.
    Posts
    9,318

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by noodles View Post
    My normalised profit does not include:
    -Fair value adjustments
    -Non operating items
    Quite right. I should learn not to try to look up things late at night and get myself into trouble!

    Your normalised profit does include $2.204m net profit after tax from 4 Seasons Feeds Limited though (note 9). That's been sold. So I don't think Bunter should use that $2.204m as part of his base earnings case for PGW for FY2015.

    SNOOPY
    Watch out for the most persistent and dangerous version of Covid-19: B.S.24/7

  6. #3256
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    274

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Snoopy View Post
    Your normalised profit does include $2.204m net profit after tax from 4 Seasons Feeds Limited though (note 9). That's been sold. So I don't think Bunter should use that $2.204m as part of his base earnings case for PGW for FY2015.

    SNOOPY
    I agree and in fact I didn't include any of the items in note 9 in my calcs.

    Nor did PGW in its 'operating EBITDA' figure.
    Equity accounted earnings aren't cash - the only cash is dividends from the companies.

    I was happy to rely on PGW's 'operating EBITDAF figure - then take the cash items off - interest and tax.

    Then believe them when they said 2015 is looking better.

    Guess we'll find out soon.

    This rain won't be hurting.

  7. #3257
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    1,347

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Snoopy View Post
    Quite right. I should learn not to try to look up things late at night and get myself into trouble!

    Your normalised profit does include $2.204m net profit after tax from 4 Seasons Feeds Limited though (note 9). That's been sold. So I don't think Bunter should use that $2.204m as part of his base earnings case for PGW for FY2015.

    SNOOPY
    Quite Right. I should read the fine print.
    How about this for underlying earnings

    Operating EBITDA 58,747
    DA -11,242
    Abnornal depreciation of IT system 3,500
    EBIT 51,005
    Interest -7,926
    NPBT 43,079
    TAX @28% 12,062
    NPAT 31,017
    Equity accounted earnings (excluding 4 Seasons Feeds Limited) 497
    TOTAL NPAT 31,514
    eps 0.041
    No advice here. Just banter. DYOR

  8. #3258
    On the doghouse
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    , , New Zealand.
    Posts
    9,318

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bunter View Post
    Guess we'll find out soon.

    This rain won't be hurting.
    My fear is that PGW will declare a record half year profit due to farmers selling off their capital livestock. That won't make for a pretty second half.

    SNOOPY
    Watch out for the most persistent and dangerous version of Covid-19: B.S.24/7

  9. #3259
    On the doghouse
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    , , New Zealand.
    Posts
    9,318

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by noodles View Post
    Abnormal depreciation of IT system 3,500
    Noodles, I have been through the 2014 annual report. I saw a comment about replacing the point of sale IT systems. But I didn't find anything about an abnormal charge of $3.5m. Can you point me where that figure came from please?

    TIA

    SNOOPY
    Watch out for the most persistent and dangerous version of Covid-19: B.S.24/7

  10. #3260
    On the doghouse
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    , , New Zealand.
    Posts
    9,318

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Agrarinvestor View Post

    PGW Market Cap:

    Market Cap: 313.26M
    PGW market capitalization is now $369.876m (share price 49c).

    That is greater than the following current NZX50 listed shares, as of today:

    ATM: $310.231m
    STU: $255.662m
    SKL: $266.072m
    PEB: $245.334m
    KMD: $286.108m
    NZO: $273.714m

    Time for a recall? Or will the 50% of tightly held shares held by Agria preclude a return to the NZX50?

    SNOOPY
    Last edited by Snoopy; 05-02-2015 at 10:41 AM.
    Watch out for the most persistent and dangerous version of Covid-19: B.S.24/7

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •