sharetrader
Page 136 of 296 FirstFirst ... 3686126132133134135136137138139140146186236 ... LastLast
Results 1,351 to 1,360 of 2956
  1. #1351
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    21,630

    Default

    Enumerate, please know that Stat Managers are indemnified by the Government before you carry on any further.

  2. #1352
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    1,045

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balance View Post
    Enumerate, please know that Stat Managers are indemnified by the Government before you carry on any further.
    That's great news for Mr Hubbard - infinite indemnity.

    So you are party to the Terms of Reference between Her Majesty the Queen, in RIght of New Zealand and Grant Thornton?
    Do not consider my postings as investment advice. I am here to share research and to speculate on what might be. The boundary between fact and conjecture might not always be clear - best to treat all comments as speculation.

  3. #1353
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    21,630

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Enumerate View Post
    That's great news for Mr Hubbard - infinite indemnity.

    So you are party to the Terms of Reference between Her Majesty the Queen, in RIght of New Zealand and Grant Thornton?
    No - have had experience working with SM before. I think you will find that's the case with most receiverships anyway - the receivers are indemnified by the appointing entity, usually a bank or a financier.

  4. #1354
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    21,630

    Default

    Also, please note it is the Government who put AH into SM - then, appoint the Statutory managers.

    The Statutory managers are carrying out the government's mandate, not the other way round.

    But think about this for a minute - charitable trust borrows money from Aorangi. Aorangi has to pay interest to investors - but charitable trust does not have any income as loans are interest free.

    Issues - How can any business survive on a business model like that? Presumably, AH is making up the difference. If so, did he disclose to Aorangi investors? Remember Huljich fund and the top up controversy?

  5. #1355
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    1,045

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balance View Post
    But think about this for a minute - charitable trust borrows money from Aorangi. Aorangi has to pay interest to investors - but charitable trust does not have any income as loans are interest free.

    Issues - How can any business survive on a business model like that?
    Maybe the interest was capitalised in the loan amount. The charitable trust was an investment vehicle to perform some property development. These structures were actually not uncommon - though, these days, very unfashionable.

    In fact, I have some Macquarie unit trust investments that are structured along these lines.

    I just hope that the Statutory Managers haven't been bamboozled by mini-Macquarie machinations.
    Do not consider my postings as investment advice. I am here to share research and to speculate on what might be. The boundary between fact and conjecture might not always be clear - best to treat all comments as speculation.

  6. #1356
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    21,630

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Enumerate View Post
    Maybe the interest was capitalised in the loan amount. The charitable trust was an investment vehicle to perform some property development. These structures were actually not uncommon - though, these days, very unfashionable.

    In fact, I have some Macquarie unit trust investments that are structured along these lines.

    I just hope that the Statutory Managers haven't been bamboozled by mini-Macquarie machinations.
    No, Enumerate. The loans are INTEREST FREE.

  7. #1357
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    1,045

    Default

    The SCFHAs seem to holding up despite all the SCF knocking.

    A tiny parcel traded at 15cents, today. There seems to be a big gap between the bid and the ask.

    I felt sure that we would see sub-10cents following the release of the Statutory Manager's report.

    Perhaps they are all held by canny South Island Scotsmen? Maybe the only ones doing the selling are the Aucklanders? I hope they haven't gone short
    Do not consider my postings as investment advice. I am here to share research and to speculate on what might be. The boundary between fact and conjecture might not always be clear - best to treat all comments as speculation.

  8. #1358
    ShareTrader Legend Beagle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    21,362

    Default

    The last financial statements were realeased in early April so it took over three months for auditied interim accounts. Assuming a similar time fram for the end of year accounts that puts the expected audited result at early October, well past the soft deadline of end of August for the resoration of Trust deed covenants.

    Thank you Balance for bringing exactly that to the blog. Yes Aorangi was in a most unsatisfactory state in many more ways than one prior to the appointment of SM, that's spot-on.

  9. #1359
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    1,045

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Roger View Post
    Assuming a similar time fram for the end of year accounts.
    Check your assumptions ...
    Do not consider my postings as investment advice. I am here to share research and to speculate on what might be. The boundary between fact and conjecture might not always be clear - best to treat all comments as speculation.

  10. #1360
    Legend minimoke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Christchurch, New Zealand.
    Posts
    6,502

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Enumerate View Post
    The Statutory Managers have effectively destoryed Allan Hubbard's business.
    I'm not so sure about that - perhaps its a bit too early to be so dramatic. But let look at Allans view of his Aorangi business compared with the Stat Mans view - bearing in mind the Stat Man only has three weeks experience in it.

    Alan reckons assets are $128m. The Stat Man reckon its $132m
    Alan reckons he has $88m of clients cash. The Stat Man reckons its $96m
    Alan reckons hes got $40m of his own skin in the game. The Sta Man reckons its $36m.
    Alan reckons its a Mortgage Company. The Stat Man thinks its morphed into a finance company
    Alan says it has loans and mortgages. The Stat Man reckons the money has gone, in part, to AH's own financial interests and trusts. Some loans appear not to be secured by land and some loans appear to have no registered security.
    Alan is silent on Aorangi money going into Trusts (Otipua Charitable Trust, Oxford Charitable Trust, Regent Charitable Trust, Morgan Charitable Trust, Benmore Charitable Trust, and
    Wai-iti Charitable Trust.) formed in March 2010 into which he was transferring his personal assets.
    Alan is silent on Aorangi money going to Te Tua Trust. The Stat Man says this Trust was giving interest free loans and it seems some of those loans are in arrears.
    Alan says he is NZ's most honorable man. The Stat Man is silent on that.

    I think that Alan has been a little conservative with the information he has shared. It appears there are loan impairments and arrears (as one would expect) but I'm not so sure it is reasonable to suggest the Stat Man has destroyed AH's business. Perhaps the train was already heading along that particular track pre June 20

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •