Been on the AGM and thought to share some of my impressions with you ... for the benefit of shareholders who couldn't make it:
Full board attendance and lots of senior managers - everybody easy to recognise on their green PGW ties. Management clearly takes the AGM seriously. As well - a lot of Agria people there ... but no surprise, given that they own 50%.
Other shareholders - my estimate between 50 and 70 (I know, I should have spent more time counting them). Still lots of empty seats - would be nice to get the room next time full
.
Presentation published on the NZX:
https://www.nzx.com/files/attachments/223559.pdf.
After a brief introduction from chairman Alan Lai - the main part of the presentation was hold by Mark Dwedney, and he answered as well the questions (I think all of them ...). Now - we know how the year went (actually - not too bad ...) what I heard "between the lines" is that they try to improve the expertise / soft skills of their staff and the organisational culture.
Mark talked about a number of "exciting contracts" they won in the wool area (high quality / high margin), but didn't quantify them.
Strategy: South America was still boasted as opportunity - and when I followed up after the meeting with some of the directors, they called South America "low hanging fruit" but it felt that they are as well still working on China as long term target (no surprise given the board composition).
Financial results outlook: Came obviously with all the appropriate disclaimers ... but the earnings downgrade from this morning was more packaged like: "if we achieve that, than it will be the second best year in recent history" (and yes, this is what it is - check slide 22). Overall people appeared to be reasonable optimistic (despite the dairy sector) and expecting definitely a recovery in 2017.
Most of the overseas directors (but Alan) stood for re-election - and they all talked about the growth they expect long term to see ... maybe as well a reflection on the share price Agria paid for PGW, but it felt (as well in individual discussions) that they do see huge future growth potential in Asia - though mid to long term.
Good to see all the candidates speaking to the meeting ... though I must say, that most of the came better across in a 1-to-1 after the meeting than in their address to the meeting (cultural background - eye contact / language?).
Some of the questions I found interesting and didn't comment on earlier (like future markets - s. above) .... in no particular order:
Q: Expected milk price payout for 2016? Marks answer (with lots of disclaimers and his private view ...): Fonterra's current indication of $5 /kg is probably quite realistic ... though personally could he see it going up to $6 (he said ... maybe ... just his hope);
Q: Given PGW's slim margins - what is their unique sales proposition? A: Expertise of their staff ... (and maybe that's something they try to improve with their training focus).
Q: What would a very dry summer mean for PGW? A: A summer with some regions dry would be "business as usual". If really all parts of NZ would be impacted, than things are more complicated, but even than there would be opportunities (e.g. if the drought is followed by a not too late drought breaker ...
Q: Impact on silverfern deal ... A: They have a good relationship with Silverfern and don't see that at risk. Good to see them now on a more solid financial basis.
Q: reason for increased inventory in South America (actually Max from the NZSA found this point - Respect - he must have read the report!)? Answer: they do expect improved business and took this risk ('You can buy seeds only once a year")'
Q: Gender diversity in the board? A: concern noted ... they do have a policy ... but as we see, at this stage it is just males on the board (though obviously with some ethnic diversity.
There was as well a question on why they report on EBITDA instead of NPAT ... but somehow did the answer escape my attention ...
Ah yes - most of the questions came either from the NZSA ... and from one other shareholder (who shall not be identified
). Went well, though a bit more wide spread question basis next time couldn't hurt ...
My personal impression on PGW: I think I go with the Chinese owners and do recognise long term value in this company. Intend to stay invested (and potentially accumulate if the SP drops). However - I said that before for other companies ... and I was not always right ... i.e. DYOR!
Bookmarks