ACT's David Seymour - i like his style.

[t.rexjr]

I would argue religious conviction is a totally valid reason. Or are people of a religious persuasion not allowed to have a view that aligns with their beliefs?

The Bill has nothing to do with religion. Not one iota. People of a religious persuasion are still allowed to have a view that aligns with their beliefs

That statement may now be written:

People have the ability to maintain a view, & now also make a choice, that aligns with their beliefs, their situation and themselves...

[blackcap]

The Bill has nothing to do with religion. Not one iota. People of a religious persuasion are still allowed to have a view that aligns with their beliefs

That statement may now be written:

People have the ability to maintain a view, & now also make a choice, that aligns with their beliefs, their situation and themselves...

That is the point I am trying to make. If people of religious persuasion and view think that euthanasia is a good thing they can vote accordingly. If they think it is a bad thing they can vote accordingly. (of course there are many other variables at play when people make decisions but that is up to them)