sharetrader

View Poll Results: Should there be a Capital Gains Tax on Property

Voters
131. You may not vote on this poll
  • No

    213 100.00%
  • Yes

    74 56.49%
  • Goff is just an idiot

    2,147,483,658 100.00%
  • Epic fail for Labour

    1,935 100.00%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Results 1 to 10 of 1008

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand
    Posts
    4,921

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bjauck View Post

    Demands for expenditures for increased defence, infrastructure, health and aged care would probably outweigh further efficiency gains.

    I am not sure what artificial price increases are. The inbuilt inflation from the RBNZ remit? However why would an inflation adjustment be any more likely for a CGT, than for example a tax-free IT threshold, or automatic inflation adjusted IT brackets? The latter two should receive greater priority.
    Why do we need greater expenditure on defence, infrastructure, health and aged care on a per capita basis? You would think technology etc has granted efficiencies that would have led to reduced spending requirements? Maybe technology is not that efficient after all?

    I was not debating the inflation adjustments on IT threshold and automatic inflation adjusted IT, they have merit on their own right. Inflation is a thief and has cost the tax payer dearly to the benefit of the beauracracy which seems to get larger and larger.

    As Thomas Sowell is quoted as saying "Life in general has never been even close to fair, so the pretense that government can make it fair is a valuable and inexhaustible asset to politicians who want to expand government."

  2. #2
    Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    4,832

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by blackcap View Post
    Why do we need greater expenditure on defence, infrastructure, health and aged care on a per capita basis? You would think technology etc has granted efficiencies that would have led to reduced spending requirements? Maybe technology is not that efficient after all?

    I was not debating the inflation adjustments on IT threshold and automatic inflation adjusted IT, they have merit on their own right. Inflation is a thief and has cost the tax payer dearly to the benefit of the beauracracy which seems to get larger and larger.

    As Thomas Sowell is quoted as saying "Life in general has never been even close to fair, so the pretense that government can make it fair is a valuable and inexhaustible asset to politicians who want to expand government."
    More and greater technology and treatments obviously mean more technological advance in more areas that needs to be paid for. However that requires the technological advances, that make the labour force more productive, need to be invested in. NZ's investment environment however is such that any money available is prioritised in making the price of land more expensive.

    Previous governments of course did not provide the expenditure needed to service the level of immigration and population growth that their policies encouraged. So we will need to pay for the catch up now. There is now a backlog of expenditure needed to provide the infrastructure and services necessary.

    You were debating an inflation adjustment for any CGT. Of course that naturally begs the question for inflation adjustments elsewhere in the tax system. You seemed to want "fairness" for the owners of assets in particular.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •