That's hilarious 13 years of this stuff I'm a four month noob and seen many many examples in the crypto thread how do ya'll put up with it? Ignore button would help I suppose.
So its fair to say he went from
One of the best things you can do as a newbie is to go right back to the start of the thread you are reading and on the odd occasion such as this one certain posters "very kindly" make their bias clear right from the outset.
I am surprised the shares are still trending up but quite philosophical about it. Perhaps the pending inclusion in the NZX20 index is having an impact.
Last edited by Beagle; 11-12-2017 at 05:57 PM.
Ecclesiastes 11:2: “Divide your portion to seven, or even to eight, for you do not know what misfortune may occur on the earth.”
Ben Graham - In the short run the market is a voting machine but in the long run the market is a weighing machine
Trouble is you have to take everything with again of salt on here and elsewhere. You can deem all you want and its only your opinion for you . I have little respect for big noters.It all comes down to DYOR and NEVER allow yourself to be influenced by ANYBODY. Some great resources and sharing on here but when it comes to making and losing money some human beings have no scruples at all and will be wolves in sheeps clothing. i find share trader one of the better chat sites.
Last edited by Joshuatree; 11-12-2017 at 07:10 PM.
Iceman - you will be travelling on a 777 200 or 777 300.
You will not be on a 787 Dreamliner.
At this stage AIR tells me the Dreamliner is scheduled for that flight. They could replace it with the 777-200 which they used on this route before the Dreamliners.
I really wish AIR would disclose some more information? Who is paying for this AIR or RR?
p.s good analysis Roger...
Originally Posted by iceman
At this stage AIR tells me the Dreamliner is scheduled for that flight. They could replace it with the 777-200 which they used on this route before the Dreamliners.
Interesting that tonight they cancelled a flight to Houston which is a 777-200 route..
Thanks Brend. Like you I wish AIR were more forthcoming but I doubt we'll ever be told. I am sure the exact details of who is paying for what will be commercially sensitive and RR will ensure any deal they agree to is subject to a confidentiality agreement. Even if RR do agree to pick up the tab for the lease of these aircraft those fuel hungry 4 engine A340's are not cheap to run by any means, one wonders who picks up the tab for the substantial extra fuel it'll burn over the ensuing months. Plenty of fodder here for the new general legal counsel of AIR to get her teeth stuck into...
More concerning however is I feel AIR are not being forthcoming on exactly what happened to those two engines and any collateral damage to the aircraft so as not to scare the travelling public nor do I feel they being scrupulously honest about the risk of another engine failure. Bad luck happens in 3's ?
Originally Posted by Benny1
Yeah this is the real cost. With this issue effecting this aircraft type around the world it doesn't take long for the travelling public to get anxious about flying this aircraft..
If the 787 were to lose it's 350 minute(?) EDTO rating this could restrict some AIR flights inparticular EZE meaning 777's would have to take over those service's
Good point Civil aviation could feasibly make this call at any stage given the well known issues with this engine and the two failures last week or worse, ground the entire older version RR powered 787 fleet. How it affected ANA https://www.theguardian.com/business...t-entire-fleet
Last edited by Beagle; 11-12-2017 at 09:49 PM.
Ecclesiastes 11:2: “Divide your portion to seven, or even to eight, for you do not know what misfortune may occur on the earth.”
Ben Graham - In the short run the market is a voting machine but in the long run the market is a weighing machine
From this Saturday the plan is for the 787 to swap out with most probably a 777 300.
Either way - you're going
Originally Posted by iceman
At this stage AIR tells me the Dreamliner is scheduled for that flight. They could replace it with the 777-200 which they used on this route before the Dreamliners.
Thanks Brend. Like you I wish AIR were more forthcoming but I doubt we'll ever be told. I am sure the exact details of who is paying for what will be commercially sensitive and RR will ensure any deal they agree to is subject to a confidentiality agreement.
If my facts are incorrect, let me know. When I read the article it said that maintenance on the engines would have to be done earlier than expected. It clearly means it’s a question of “when” or “if”. They knew the engines had a problem but surely not enough for safety issues...but it concerns me, feels like ignorance.
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by Fatboyj
Bookmarks