-
08-10-2018, 11:51 PM
#10991
Member
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lByBtCKM98s
Bloomberg interview with the CEO. 3:26 if you want to hear her discuss the share sale.
-
09-10-2018, 12:06 AM
#10992
Member
Originally Posted by zgnz
Thanks for this.
Now we now why there is an increase in the marketing spend as previously advised by the trougher, it's because: "word of mouth" is the main a2 marketing strategy.
She struggled a bit at the end to clearly justify her sell off, but what is done, is done.
Last edited by Muppett; 09-10-2018 at 12:07 AM.
-
09-10-2018, 09:29 AM
#10993
"My personal motives are inextricably linked to shareholders" Hmmmm...She has a long history in her career of selling down shares shortly after they vest as reported by NBR recently.
Ecclesiastes 11:2: “Divide your portion to seven, or even to eight, for you do not know what misfortune may occur on the earth.”
Ben Graham - In the short run the market is a voting machine but in the long run the market is a weighing machine
-
09-10-2018, 09:36 AM
#10994
Member
funny, I was kind worried when she was talking about she still got twice ATM shares......
-
09-10-2018, 09:41 AM
#10995
Originally Posted by Beagle
"My personal motives are inextricably linked to shareholders" Hmmmm...She has a long history in her career of selling down shares shortly after they vest as reported by NBR recently.
Her motives are linked alright, she sells for a massive profit whilst peasant shareholders lose money,bit like the old medieval times when the king gorged himself on luxury while the commoners worked to pay for that extravagance.
-
09-10-2018, 09:44 AM
#10996
Originally Posted by couta1
Her motives are linked alright, she sells for a massive profit whilst peasant shareholders lose money,bit like the old medieval times when the king gorged himself on luxury while the commoners worked to pay for that extravagance.
If the company has long term good (brilliant) prospects then, unless you sell (and why would you?), shareholders don't lose money at all.
Did the company make a loss?
Are their prospects worse now after she sold?
Get a grip!
-
09-10-2018, 09:50 AM
#10997
Originally Posted by dobby41
If the company has long term good (brilliant) prospects then, unless you sell (and why would you?), shareholders don't lose money at all.
Did the company make a loss?
Are their prospects worse now after she sold?
Get a grip!
I have got a grip and a sense of humour.Lol. PS-Over a billion wiped off the company market cap would imply that something has been lost.
-
09-10-2018, 09:52 AM
#10998
Originally Posted by dobby41
If the company has long term good (brilliant) prospects then, unless you sell (and why would you?), shareholders don't lose money at all.
Did the company make a loss?
Are their prospects worse now after she sold?
Get a grip!
While, arguably, shareholders who hold dont lose money they do most certainly loose value. A sale is cementing the loss.
Prospects are potentially worse. You want a CEO who uses sound judgement to run a company aligned to directors governance which is aligned to shareholder / owner expectations and with the ultimate aim of returning positive value to shareholders. Be that either dividends or an increase in capital value. The consequence of using her judgement is a severe erosion of shareholder value - which is not a competent judgment nor decision. And that is without delving into her judgement that left her with an outstanding tax bill that require a saher sell off and also considering putting money into investments other than ATM.
-
09-10-2018, 09:54 AM
#10999
bit of tongue and cheek
Attachment 10041
one step ahead of the herd
-
09-10-2018, 09:59 AM
#11000
Member
Originally Posted by bull....
OMG... I have got a good laugh at the pic.
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks