Quote Originally Posted by BlackPeter View Post
Apparently it was A$357000 in 2011 (expenses, this is ...) and it must have stayed on that level (or slightly grown).

More concerning than the greediness of the CEO is that ANZ does not seem to have systems to catch such wrong doing of their executives. Well, one could obviously argue - 8 years and roughly 3.2 million dollars later (extrapolating the stated expenses from 2011 and 2018) they noticed ... but still - are they the right bank we should trust to look after our money?
It’s really quite sad. It’s not as tho he was poorly paid. We can do with out that kind of greed in our top company executives.